Twitter recently faced a wave of discontent as it unexpectedly imposed limitations on the number of tweets users could read per day. This move caused widespread confusion and frustration among the user base, further exacerbating the already chaotic state of affairs on the platform. Twitter justified this decision by citing the need to combat harmful activities perpetrated by bad actors, but it failed to provide prior notice to its users.

In a blog post on Twitter’s official business blog, the company explained that the temporary usage limitation was implemented to identify and eliminate bots and other malicious actors that were detrimentally impacting the platform. The post highlighted the fact that notifying users in advance would have given these bad actors an opportunity to modify their behavior and evade detection. Twitter’s objective was to prevent the manipulation of conversations and individuals through the exploitation of public data for AI models.

Related // Bluesky faces outage amidst Twitter exodus due to new restrictions

Despite Twitter’s explanation, skepticism arose within the community regarding the true motives behind the rate limiting decision. Some users questioned the legitimacy of Twitter’s claim, suggesting that it may be a convenient excuse to curtail user activity. They argued that limiting the number of tweets users can read per day has an adverse effect on advertisers’ ability to reach their target audience, potentially impacting Twitter’s revenue stream.

The implementation of rate limiting had unintended consequences, severely disrupting the functionality of Twitter’s website and applications. Even the widely-used TweetDeck app, relied upon by power users, succumbed to the limitations. To address the situation, Twitter introduced an updated version of TweetDeck, aimed at mitigating the issues caused by rate limiting. However, Twitter sprung another surprise by making the app exclusive to verified accounts, effectively creating a paywall that prevents the majority of users from accessing TweetDeck.

Related // Elon Musk addresses Twitter’s temporary login requirement, citing data scraper threat

One of the primary concerns arising from rate limiting on Twitter is its impact on advertising efforts. With users restricted in their tweet consumption, advertisers face challenges in reaching their intended audience effectively. This limitation may deter advertisers from investing in Twitter as a marketing platform and could ultimately hamper Twitter’s ability to generate revenue.