Intel, one of the biggest names in tech, has been stumbling through a rough patch—think declining market share, fierce competition, and a stock price that’s taken more hits than a piñata at a kid’s birthday party. Three months ago, the company’s board gave former CEO Pat Gelsinger the boot—or, as Intel politely put it, he “retired.” Now, they’ve tapped a new leader to steer the ship: Lip-Bu Tan, a veteran of the chip world with a knack for turning businesses around. Tan officially takes the reins as Intel’s CEO on March 18, and if his track record is any indication, this could be the start of something big—or at least a wild ride worth watching.

So, who is Lip-Bu Tan? For starters, he’s no stranger to Intel. He’s been on the company’s board since 2022, giving him a front-row seat to its recent struggles and triumphs. Before that, he spent over a decade as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, a major player in chip design software and services, where he more than doubled the company’s revenue between 2009 and 2021. That’s the kind of resume that makes a boardroom sit up and take notice. Now, Tan’s stepping in to replace Gelsinger, whose exit in December 2024 was less a graceful retirement and more a case of “thanks, but we’re good.” Since then, Intel has been led by interim co-CEOs David Zinsner (who’ll stay on as CFO) and Michelle Johnston Holthaus (who’ll keep running Intel Products). But come next week, it’s Tan’s show.

Related /

• The Intel revolution that never was: why Pat Gelsinger was forced out
• Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger steps down after nearly four years of leadership

Let’s rewind a bit to set the scene. Pat Gelsinger wasn’t some random hire—Intel was his home for 30 years, from 1979 to 2009, before he left to lead VMware and EMC. When he came back in 2021 as CEO, the hope was that he’d bring some of that old Intel magic to a company that had lost its edge to rivals like AMD and TSMC. Gelsinger had a grand vision: rebuild Intel’s manufacturing muscle, reclaim its spot as the king of chipmaking, and take on the world. But the reality? Costs ballooned, delays piled up, and the board reportedly grew skeptical that his plan would ever pay off. By late 2024, they’d had enough.

Enter Tan, who’s walking into a mess that’s equal parts opportunity and minefield. Intel’s still a giant—its chips power everything from laptops to data centers, and its manufacturing footprint is massive. But it’s been bleeding ground to competitors. TSMC dominates the foundry business (making chips for other companies), while AMD’s been eating Intel’s lunch in the high-performance CPU market. Oh, and don’t forget NVIDIA, which has turned GPUs into the hottest ticket in town thanks to the AI boom.

Tan’s not tipping his hand just yet about his big-picture strategy, but his first memo as CEO (shared via Intel’s press release) offers some breadcrumbs. “Together, we will work hard to restore Intel’s position as a world-class products company, establish ourselves as a world-class foundry and delight our customers like never before,” he wrote. Translation: Intel’s not abandoning its dual role as a chip designer and manufacturer anytime soon. That’s a nod to Gelsinger’s push to bring more manufacturing in-house while also opening Intel’s factories to outside clients—a plan that’s cost billions and sparked debate about whether it’s genius or a money pit.

But Tan’s not just parroting the old playbook. He’s dropping hints of a bolder approach. He calls Intel “an engineering-focused company” that needs to “take calculated risks to disrupt and leapfrog” the competition. That’s the kind of talk that could mean anything from doubling down on cutting-edge tech (like next-gen processors or AI chips) to shaking up the business model entirely. Will he stick with Gelsinger’s vision of a fully integrated Intel, or might he accelerate rumors of spinning off the foundry business—or even selling chunks of the company to refocus? Analysts are split.

Tan’s no rookie when it comes to this kind of gig. At Cadence, he took a company that was solid but stagnant and turned it into a powerhouse, growing its revenue from $1.15 billion in 2009 to over $2.68 billion by 2021, per Cadence’s own financials. He did it by zeroing in on what mattered—streamlining operations, betting on emerging tech like AI and 5G, and keeping customers happy. If he can pull off a similar trick at Intel, he might just quiet the doubters who say the company’s best days are behind it.

Still, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Intel’s got a powerful and differentiated computing platform, and a customer base that’s still loyal despite the slip-ups. Its U.S.-based manufacturing plants are a geopolitical ace in the hole, especially as Washington pushes to bring chip production back home. But the clock’s ticking. TSMC’s churning out chips at 3 nanometers while Intel’s still playing catch-up with its 7nm process. And with AI driving demand for specialized silicon, Intel can’t afford to miss the boat.

So, what’s next? Tan’s got a tightrope to walk—balancing investor pressure, tech innovation, and a workforce that’s probably a little shell-shocked from the past few years. His memo ends on an optimistic note: “That’s what this moment demands of us as we remake Intel for the future.” It’s a nice sentiment, but the real test will be in the execution. If Tan can blend his Cadence playbook with Intel’s unique strengths, he might just pull off a comeback story for the ages. If not? Well, let’s just say Intel’s board has shown it’s not afraid to hit the eject button.

For now, all eyes are on March 18, when Tan steps into the corner office.